For the second time in two consecutive days, the Department of
State Services, on Wednesday, failed to produce the immediate-past
National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.), before a High
Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Maitama, Abuja, for the
continuation of his trial over charges of alleged diversion of funds
meant for the procurement of arms.
The case scheduled to come up before the court on Wednesday was one
of the two relating to the alleged diversion of arms funds instituted
against Dasuki and others by the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission.
Due to the DSS’ failure to produce the ex-NSA in court on
Wednesday, the trial judge, Justice Hussein Baba-Yusuf, was forced to
grant the request for an adjournment by the EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Rotimi
Jacobs (SAN).
But while adjourning the case, Justice Baba-Yusuf warned that the trial should not be taken lightly. The judge ruled, “I only want to say that the proceedings of the court should not be taken lightly.
“Extraneous considerations must not be allowed to interfere with the course of justice.”
The EFCC prosecutor, Jacobs, had told the judge on Wednesday that
the DSS Director of Legal Services attributed the failure of the agency
to produce the ex-NSA in court on Tuesday to an ‘oversight’.
Jacobs explained further that after he discovered that the ex-NSA
had not been produced in court at the scheduled time on Wednesday, the
EFCC contacted the DSS, which according to the prosecutor, said the
ex-NSA was unwilling to attend court because he (Dasuki) was indisposed.
Jacobs said, “I contacted the Director of Legal, DSS, to explain the absence of the first defendant in court yesterday (Tuesday).
“He (the Director of Legal) told me it was an oversight and that the first defendant would be produced this morning (Wednesday).
“I made a series of efforts when I discovered he was not yet in court this morning, but I was unable to contact the DSS.
“I immediately contacted my client, the EFCC, for them to approach the DSS.
“My client later told me that the first defendant said he was indisposed and would not come to court.
“On account of that, I will be asking for an adjournment.”
In response, Dasuki’s lawyer, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), said he had
no objection to the prosecutor’s application for an adjournment.
But he described the situation as ‘an inter-departmental issue’. He
added that the continued detention of Dasuki highlighted the
powerlessness of the court, saying the court granted the ex-NSA bail but
he was not allowed to enjoy the bail.
On his part, another defence lawyer in the case, Chief Akin
Olujinmi (SAN), described as ‘irritating’ the oversight excuse given by
the agency as the reason for the failure to produce the ex-NSA in court
on Tuesday.
Olujinmi said although he had no objection to the application for
adjournment, the judge should direct the DSS to produce Dasuki in court
on the next trial date.
He said, “I also want to put it on record that we have been
coming to court ready for trial; it is the prosecution that has not been
allowing the trial to proceed.
“My Lord, quite honestly, I find it irritating that somebody
said their failure to produce the first defendant in court was an
oversight.”
“If they elected to keep him, they have the duty to ensure that
they keep track of the dates of trial in court and they cannot say
their failure to produce him was an oversight without any apology
tendered to the court.
“I find myself in a position that I cannot oppose the application for an adjournment.
“But I pray your lordship to direct that those keeping the
first defendant in custody should be alive to their responsibility by
producing the first defendant in court at the next date.”
The DSS has been detaining the ex-NSA since December 2015. Justice
Baba-Yusuf, while adjourning the case, warned that the court’s
proceedings should not be taken lightly.
He adjourned the case till July 10, 11 and 12.

No comments:
Post a Comment